DMG LuxaCrown dental restoration case study

Restoration and Repair
Tools
Typography
  • Smaller Small Medium Big Bigger
  • Default Helvetica Segoe Georgia Times

Dr. Daniel Farhan MSc creates a DMG LuxaCrown customised, semi-permanent dental restoration

Indirect restorations are used regularly in prosthetic dentistry and can be differentiated in various ways. One of the areas in which they can be distinguished is their retention period in the mouth.

On the one hand, there are temporary measures worn for a short period of time which are used to protect the underlying tooth until the final restoration is inserted and, on the other, there are long-term temporaries, often used in the treatment of teeth which might be at risk.

These are either used only to guarantee the prognosis of the tooth to be restored with a crown for a certain period, often three-six months, or in cases where a risky situation is essentially undergoing “final” restoration. Thus, figuratively speaking, these assume the same functions as a final restoration, which increases the demands placed on the materials used when it comes to marginal seal, resilience and long-term stability.

This gives rise to the question of whether long-term temporaries can remain in the mouth for an unlimited period in special indication groups.
In this article a clinical example is used to illustrate the use of the innovative new crown composite (LuxaCrown) for the fabrication of a long-term temporary with an as yet undefined lifespan.

The materials used: StatusBlue, LuxaPost, LuxaCore Z, LuxaCrown, Luxatemp-Glaze & Bond, are manufactured by DMG, Hamburg.

Clinical case

A 63-year old male patient presented himself at our dental practice with significant pain in tooth 46 (Fig 1 top).
Following examination and diagnosis, the tooth received endodontic treatment. In this specific case, we decided to remove the existing crown following a preliminary impression with A-silicone StatusBlue, in order to allow as bacteria-free endodontic treatment as possible (Fig 2). This was to prevent any compromise to the subsequent endodontic result due to an insufficient marginal fit and any resulting coronal leakage.

The plans for the final restoration included a customised semi-permanent chairside restoration in a direct procedure using the innovative crown material LuxaCrown. This material makes it possible to restore the tooth for the long-term without compromising on the marginal fit, resilience, shade stability or aesthetic reconstruction. Following successful root canal treatment, the severely damaged tooth was reconstructed using an adhesive post and core (LuxaPost and LuxaCore Z) before undergoing standard preparation for incorporation of a single crown (Figs 3 and 4).

After checking for undercut areas the core was isolated with Vaseline.
The impression produced with StatusBlue was then filled with LuxaCrown (Fig 5) and the tray was repositioned in the patient’s mouth no more than 30 seconds later.

During the elastic phase of the crown material, which spans a period between 1:30 and 2:20 minutes, the impression must be removed. The semi-permanent restoration achieved its final hardness after five minutes.

After removing the crown from the impression (Fig 6) the rough excess was removed with crown shears and the crown placed on the core to check the fit. Afterwards, final finishing was performed extraorally using stones and rubber polishers as well as polishing brushes (Figs 7 and 8).

Then the crown was cemented with Ketac Cem according to the manufacturer‘s instructions. The result was more than satisfactory as far as the fit and aesthetics were concerned (Figs 9).

Author

Dr Daniel Farhan is the co-founder of a group dental practice based in Heidelberg, Germany. He is a specialist in prosthodontics (DGPro) and focuses on prosthodontics and implantology (DGOI). His professional expertise includes: implants, dental prosthesis, root canal treatment, maxillofacial diagnostics and therapy, dental aesthetics and working with dento-phobic patients